[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Re: General--Mathematica and Subversion

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg69704] Re: [mg69668] Re: [mg69655] General--Mathematica and Subversion
• From: jmt <jmt at dxdydz.net>
• Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:29:38 -0400 (EDT)
• Organization: dxdydz
• References: <200609190945.FAA28625@smc.vnet.net> <200609200644.CAA24433@smc.vnet.net> <acbec1a40609200137u62033edia78ee26763d949d2@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday 20 September 2006 10:37, you wrote:
> I thought Workbench was designed to work with Subversion, rather than
> replace it??

As said, I haven't tested Wolfram's Workbench.

It is quite possible that Workbench uses subversion as version control 
backend, but it might use another system, or make it an option.

Subversion itself uses two different backends (BerkeleyDB and FSFS since 2004) 
leading to architectural choices when implementing what might be considered 
as a service.

Since Workbench is Eclipse-based, you must somehow realize the high degree of  
modularity for this kind of software application.

jmt

• References:
  • General--Mathematica and Subversion
    • From: daimos@sbox.TUGraz.at
  • Re: General--Mathematica and Subversion
    • From: jmt <jmt@dxdydz.net>