MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Suggestions for translating a Do[] loop ...

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg69800] Re: [mg69773] Suggestions for translating a Do[] loop ...
  • From: "Adriano Pascoletti" <pascolet at dimi.uniud.it>
  • Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 04:45:03 -0400 (EDT)

David,
consider two lists

In[1]:=
n = 10; A = Array[Subscript[a, #1] & , {n - 1}]; 
B = Array[Subscript[b, #1] & , {n - 1}]; 

the list r is computed by

In[3]:=
r = Reverse[FoldList[#2[[1]]*((#2[[2]] + #1)/
        (1 + #2[[2]] + #1)) & , 0, 
     Transpose[{Reverse[A], Reverse[B]}]]]; 

In order to verify the result let

In[4]:=
f = Function[i, A[[i]]*((B[[i]] + r[[i + 1]])/
      (1 + B[[i]] + r[[i + 1]]))]; 

and compute

In[5]:=
Function[i, f[i] - r[[i]]] /@ Range[n - 1]

Out[5]=
{0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}


Hope it helps
Adriano Pascoletti


David Annetts wrote ..
> Hi,
> 
> Given that a, b & r are lists of the same length, can anyone suggest a
> translation of the following Do[] loop to something functional?  It looks
> like an ideal application for Fold, but for me, the loop going backwards
> is
> really obscuring things.
> 
> The loop is 
> 
> 	Do[
>     		r[[j]] = a[[j]] * (b[[j]] + r[[j + 1]]) / (1 + b[[j]] * r[[j
> + 1]]),
>     		{j, Length@a - 1, 1, -1}
>     		];
> 
> with r[[Length@a]] = 0.
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Dave.
> 


  • Prev by Date: RE: Suggestions for translating a Do[] loop ...
  • Next by Date: Re: Inequalities
  • Previous by thread: RE: Suggestions for translating a Do[] loop ...
  • Next by thread: FormatType styles in StyleSheets