|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Solveand Eliminatechoke on simple systems of equations
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg74818] Re: Solveand Eliminatechoke on simple systems of equations
- From: Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 04:23:47 -0400 (EDT)
On 4/5/07 at 4:15 AM, darrell.long at gmail.com (Darrell Long) wrote:
>Yep, I found the missing comma. The hazards of translation!
>I am puzzled why Mathematica spins on the original though.
This happens since without the comma, you still have valid Mathematica synt=
ax. That is
In[1]:=
(2*U + L)*P211 == L*P221 + U*P202*(L + 2*U)*P113 ==
K*P313 + K*P213 + U*P102
Out[1]=
P211*(L + 2*U) == L*P221 + P113*P202*U*(L + 2*U) ==
K*P213 + K*P313 + P102*U
So, you simply transform the problem from one set of equations to another w=
hen the comma is omitted.
--
To reply via email subtract one hundred and four
Prev by Date:
integration for CDF[NoncentralChiSquareDistribution] failing
Next by Date:
Optimal variable selection in multiple linear regression ?
Previous by thread:
Re: integration for CDF[NoncentralChiSquareDistribution] failing
Next by thread:
Optimal variable selection in multiple linear regression ?
|