Re: presence of Wolfram Research in this mailing list
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg79663] Re: presence of Wolfram Research in this mailing list
- From: David Bailey <dave at Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 05:05:59 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Jens-Peer Kuska wrote:
> Hi Murray,
> it should so, because there is not printed documentation
> of all the new stuff, and the help center is, friendly spoken
> unorganized, the users can't help their self.
> Murray Eisenberg wrote:
>> Is it my imagination or is it reality that, since the release of
>> Mathematica 6.0, responses by Wolfram Research staff to posts have been
>> considerably more frequent than before?
>> If so, then thank you! (We need it.)
I really hope some people at Wolfram are reading all the comments here
about the documentation centre (and its contents), and are frantically
fixing it! I really think this should be top priority - there is a lot
of functionality in 6.0 that is very hard to access, and I would not
like to be a newbie faced with 6.0 and no equivalent of the old bible!
Prev by Date:
Re: Module inside Module. Conflict between inner Module local variable
Next by Date:
Re: FindRoot with mixed complex and real variables?
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Module inside Module. Conflict between inner Module local variable
Next by thread:
RE: How do you set up third party (or your own) packages?