[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Is there a way to rewrite Roots[#n] result in easier to read
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg80337] Re: Is there a way to rewrite Roots[#n] result in easier to read
*From*: Jepessen <danwolf80_ at _libero_._it>
*Date*: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 05:31:10 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <fa3dlf$k1$1@smc.vnet.net>
Il Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:02:23 +0000, Nasser Abbasi ha scritto:
> Hello;
> This is Mathematica 6.01
>
> Is there a way to make the output of the following DSolve more readable? It
> contains lots of Root[] with #n in it.
>
>
> Remove["Global`*"]
> ode11 = Derivative[1][y][x] -
> 1/Sqrt[Subscript[a, 4]*x^4 + Subscript[a, 3]*x^3 +
> Subscript[a, 2]*x^2 + Subscript[a, 1]*x + Subscript[a, 0]] ==
> 0;
> DSolve[ode11, y[x], x]
>
> here is a pic of the output:
>
> http://12000.org/tmp/081507/output.PNG
>
> I understand what #'s are for, but was wondering if the output can be
> written using more 'traditional' form so it will easier to read? i.e having
> the polynomial whose Roots are being called for, to be explicitly written
> out or something along those lines?...I tried Simplify[].
>
> thanks,
> Nasser
Believe me, the generic solution for a 4th equation is mooore long... Roots
is the more efficient way to write a generic solution.
Try
Solve[a*x^4 + b*x^3 + c*x^2 + d*x + e == 0, x]
And see the generic solution in explicit form. You can create particular
cases, replacinx a_x with numbers, and seeing if solution is written in a
more efficient way and, if it's remain with Roots, you can always have
numerical results using N function.
Daniele
Prev by Date:
**Re: 3DPlot in Mathematica 6**
Next by Date:
**Documentation Center (Mathematica Help) problem and solution**
Previous by thread:
**Re: "385-bit SHA code:"**
Next by thread:
**Documentation Center (Mathematica Help) problem and solution**
| |