|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: "385-bit SHA code:"
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg80393] Re: "385-bit SHA code:"
- From: Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:02:08 -0400 (EDT)
On 8/18/07 at 5:39 AM, chris at chiasson.name (Chris Chiasson) wrote:
>The example for Hash in the documentation includes:
>385-bit SHA code: Hash[x^2+10, "SHA385"]
>This returns unevaluated. Perhaps a 384 bit example was intended?
Since the list of accepted hash codes under more information
doesn't include "SHA385" nor is 385 a multiple of a power of 2,
this must be a typographical error. And since all of the
possible hash codes except "SHA384" have an example, clearly
this example was intended to be "SHA384"
--
To reply via email subtract one hundred and four
Prev by Date:
Re: Dashing with alternating colors?
Next by Date:
On partitioning lists by intervals
Previous by thread:
"385-bit SHA code:"
Next by thread:
Re: Is there a way to rewrite Roots[#n] result in easier to read
|