|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Timing and Pi
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg84426] Re: Timing and Pi
- From: "Dana DeLouis" <dana.del at gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 04:37:40 -0500 (EST)
> i have tried the code on two machines:
> i am astonished that there is not much difference between the two values
Hi. Just something a little different.
Out of curiosity, you may want to run the following on the two machines.
Needs["Benchmarking`"]
BenchmarkReport[]
The Third test is a timing calcultion of Pi to 380,000 digits. (See botton
of report)
Maybe some of the other 15 calculations are faster ??
--
HTH :>)
Dana DeLouis
Windows XP & Mathematica 6
"peter" <glassymeow at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fk88qk$501$1 at smc.vnet.net...
>i wish to see other people results in running the code:
> Timing[N[Pi,1000000]]
> i am using mathematica 6 ,windowsXp
> i have tried the code on two machines:
> 1- celeron 2.6GHZ-256kb cash, memory DDR-512MB-400Mhz
> the timing result is 4.281 seconds
> 2- pentium D-925 dual processor 3GHZ-4MB cash , memory DDR2-2GB-667Mhz
> the timing is 3.218 seconds
> i am astonished that there is not much difference between the two values,
even the second machine are speedier in cpu frequency and have more cash and
the memory frequency.
> thanks for all
> peter
Prev by Date:
sum over i+j+k==n
Next by Date:
how fill PolarPlot?
Previous by thread:
Re: Timing and Pi
Next by thread:
Re: Timing and Pi
|