MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Timing and Pi

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg84426] Re: Timing and Pi
  • From: "Dana DeLouis" <dana.del at gmail.com>
  • Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 04:37:40 -0500 (EST)

>  i have tried the code on two machines:
>  i am astonished that there is not much difference between the two values

Hi.  Just something a little different.
Out of curiosity, you may want to run the following on the two machines.

Needs["Benchmarking`"]

BenchmarkReport[]

The Third test is a timing calcultion of Pi to 380,000 digits. (See botton
of report)

Maybe some of the other 15 calculations are faster ??

-- 
HTH   :>)
Dana DeLouis
Windows XP & Mathematica 6



"peter" <glassymeow at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fk88qk$501$1 at smc.vnet.net...
>i wish to see other people results in running the code:
>  Timing[N[Pi,1000000]]
>  i am using mathematica 6 ,windowsXp
>  i have tried the code on two machines:
>  1- celeron 2.6GHZ-256kb cash, memory DDR-512MB-400Mhz
>  the timing result is  4.281 seconds
>  2- pentium D-925 dual processor 3GHZ-4MB cash , memory DDR2-2GB-667Mhz
>  the timing is 3.218 seconds
>  i am astonished that there is not much difference between the two values,
even the second machine are speedier in cpu frequency and have more cash and
the memory frequency.
>  thanks for all
>  peter






  • Prev by Date: sum over i+j+k==n
  • Next by Date: how fill PolarPlot?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Timing and Pi
  • Next by thread: Re: Timing and Pi