[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]
RE: Re: Showing that ArcSinh/ArcCsch is 3?
Dear Oleksandr, That's interesting: but looking at what is produced by ArcSinh/ArcCsch == 3 // FullSimplify makes me wonder just how Mathematica achieved this. In other words, what does the message that Bob Hanlon so carefully suppressed mean? Similar messages sometimes occur when checking the results of simple equations by back-substituting, especially when the solutions contain surds, and appear to show that Mathematica is diving off into real numbers to prove results involving integers and powers of integers. Tony Dr A.H. Harker Department of Physics and Astronomy University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT ]->-----Original Message----- ]->From: sashap [mailto:pavlyk at gmail.com] ]->Sent: 21 February 2007 11:04 ]->To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net ]->Subject: [mg73550] Re: Showing that ArcSinh/ArcCsch is 3? ]-> ]->Dear David, ]-> ]->It is the case in the CAS and in the real life as well that ]->proving left hand side equal to right hand side is easier ]->than deriving what right hand side the left hand side equals to. ]-> ]->I can not think of a direct way to use built-in 'knowledge' ]->to reduce ArcSinh/ArcCsch to 3, but want to point out ]->that proving it post-factum does not seem problematic: ]-> ]->In:= ]->ArcSinh/ArcCsch-3//FullSimplify ]-> ]->Out= ]->0 ]-> ]->Sincerely, ]-> ]->Oleksandr Pavlyk ]->Special Functions Developer ]->Wolfram Research Inc ]-> ]->On Feb 20, 5:24 am, "David W.Cantrell" ]-><DWCantr... at sigmaxi.net> wrote: ]->> I hope I've just overlooked something very simple. ]->> I want to transform ArcSinh/ArcCsch to 3, using just ]->"knowledge" ]->> already implemented in Mathematica. I tried FullSimplify ]->first, and it ]->> doesn't help. I tried several other things. For example, ]->> ]->> TrigToExp[ArcSinh/ArcCsch] yields ]->> ]->> Log[2 + Sqrt]/Log[1/2 + Sqrt/2]. ]->> ]->> But then how should we transform that to 3? ]->> ]->> David ]-> ]-> ]-> ]->