Services & ResourcesWolfram ForumsMathGroup Archive

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: RE: Mathematica to .NET compiler

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg79379] Re: [mg79325] RE: Mathematica to .NET compiler
• From: DrMajorBob <drmajorbob at bigfoot.com>
• Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:28:40 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <200707200725.DAA24728@smc.vnet.net> <f7sflm$rs0$1@smc.vnet.net> <9510837.1185345224222.JavaMail.root@m35>
• Reply-to: drmajorbob at bigfoot.com

There's not much of Mathematica LEFT without those features, I'd think.

Bobby

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:56:56 -0500, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com>  
wrote:

> David Annetts wrote:
>> What would be the advantages of such a compiler over (say) MathF90 (or
>> MathC++ if you're so inclined) at http://www.mathcore.com/ ?
>
> The MathCore guys kindly sent me a link to the document describing the
> subset that they support:
>
>   http://www.mathcore.com/resources/documents/mathcodec++_subset.pdf
>
> They don't support:
>
>   Pattern matching
>   Arbitrary-precision arithmetic
>   Symbolic manipulation
>   Negative array indexing
>   Strings
>   IO
>   Efficient array resizing
>   Expressions
>
> Most of these are easy to implement if you target a higher-level language
> than C++.
>



-- 
DrMajorBob at bigfoot.com

• References:
  • Mathematica to .NET compiler
    • From: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>