MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

RE: Mathematica to .NET compiler

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg79325] RE: Mathematica to .NET compiler
  • From: Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:56:56 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200707200725.DAA24728@smc.vnet.net> <f7sflm$rs0$1@smc.vnet.net>

David Annetts wrote:
> What would be the advantages of such a compiler over (say) MathF90 (or
> MathC++ if you're so inclined) at http://www.mathcore.com/ ?

The MathCore guys kindly sent me a link to the document describing the
subset that they support:

  http://www.mathcore.com/resources/documents/mathcodec++_subset.pdf

They don't support:

  Pattern matching
  Arbitrary-precision arithmetic
  Symbolic manipulation
  Negative array indexing
  Strings
  IO
  Efficient array resizing
  Expressions

Most of these are easy to implement if you target a higher-level language
than C++.

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
OCaml for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/?usenet


  • Prev by Date: Re: style question
  • Next by Date: Re: NDSolve plot problem
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mathematica to .NET compiler
  • Next by thread: Re: RE: Mathematica to .NET compiler