Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2007
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Best practice for Mathematica package development

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg77473] Re: [mg77415] Re: Best practice for Mathematica package development
  • From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name>
  • Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 05:41:50 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <f43e7d$mv$1@smc.vnet.net> <200706061044.GAA23649@smc.vnet.net>

On 6/8/07, Andrew Moylan <andrew.j.moylan at gmail.com> wrote:
> That seems to be the recommended file layout. But why not just have a
> single file, PackageName.m, and put it directly in the $Path?

That would work well if you have no other files that you want to
distribute with your package. Such files might include license text,
readme text, install text, package documentation, etc.

-- 
http://chris.chiasson.name/


  • Prev by Date: Re: Selecting Sub-lists After Split
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: Antialiasing of 3D graphics
  • Previous by thread: Re: Best practice for Mathematica package development
  • Next by thread: Re: Best practice for Mathematica package development