|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Why use Java in Mathematica?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg78208] Re: [mg78191] Why use Java in Mathematica?
- From: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:07:43 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Mathematics & Statistics, Univ. of Mass./Amherst
- References: <a6e65e8d0706220205m63dc9817id956db71bd8457c3@mail.gmail.com> <200706251104.HAA05007@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: murray at math.umass.edu
Why should Wolfram Research for everything have to "reinvent the wheel?" =
Aside from a slight code overhead -- which could readily be equalled
or exceeded were Mathematica to implement its own version of the Java
code for its PacletManager -- what's wrong, really, with using Java?
And how can you tell for sure where the PacletManager is the only place
Mathematica needs Java?
??? wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have tried V6.0, and find that whenever kernel starts, JavaLink is
> loaded. By inspecting javaw.exe's running status, it can be found that
> Java is started for PacletManager....
>
> Personally, I hate Java:
> 1. JRE uses two much memory, and >50MB for PacletManager
> 2. for personal taste.
>
>....it is not a good thing to make JavaLink a required
> component to Mathematica. (Some functions need Java)
>
> The reason for using Java in Mathematica is only for Internet access...=
=2E
>
> I suppose that WRI just want to make the codes related to Internet
> access cross-platform. WRI has already made both the frontend and
> kernel cross-platform, why not implement Internet accessing functions
> on different platform NATIVELY?....
--
Murray Eisenberg murray at math.umass.edu
Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H)
University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W)
710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801
Amherst, MA 01003-9305
Prev by Date:
Re: problem with Pick
Next by Date:
Re: Solving a Integral
Previous by thread:
Why use Java in Mathematica?
Next by thread:
Re: Why use Java in Mathematica?
|