MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Maximize with Integer constraints



Hi,

that's a BUG! Wolfram should take note.

Mathematica screws up if you give real constrains for integers. Consider:

Maximize[{x,0<=x<=2},{x},Integers] gives {2,{x->2}}

Maximize[{x,0<=x<=2.},{x},Integers]gives {0.,{x->0}}

hope this helps, Daniel



sdw wrote:

> given entry #1:

> 

> 

> Maximize[

> {x1 + x2 + x3 + x4,

> Element[x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 , Integers] &&

> 0 <= x1 <= 5.6 &&

> 0 <= x2 <= 8.6 &&

> 0 <= x3 <= 9.7 &&

> 4.0 <= x4 <= 22.4 }, {x1, x2, x3, x4}]

> 

> {4., {x1 -> 0, x2 -> 0, x3 -> 0, x4 -> 4}}

> 

> note -  zeros for answers

> entry #2:

> Maximize[

> {x1 + x2 + x3 + x4,

> Element[x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 , Integers] &&

> 0 <= x1 <= 5.6 &&

> 0 <= x2 <= 8.6 &&

> 0 <= x3 <= 9.7 &&

> 4.1 <= x4 <= 22.4 }, {x1, x2, x3, x4}]

> 

> {44., {x1 -> 5, x2 -> 8, x3 -> 9, x4 -> 22}}

> 

> note good answers...

> only difference is 4.1 vs. 4 in constraints

> any ideas what is going on?

> 

> thanks,

> 

> sdw 

> 

> 




  • Prev by Date: Re: search for an operator in an expression
  • Next by Date: Second argument of BeginPackage, revisited
  • Previous by thread: Re: Maximize with Integer constraints
  • Next by thread: Data Export to Excel, Reals or now Strings?