[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Re: Why use Java in Mathematica?

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg78269] Re: [mg78211] Re: Why use Java in Mathematica?
• From: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
• Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 05:28:42 -0400 (EDT)
• Organization: Mathematics & Statistics, Univ. of Mass./Amherst
• References: <a6e65e8d0706220205m63dc9817id956db71bd8457c3@mail.gmail.com> <f5o7iq$4tk$1@smc.vnet.net> <200706260809.EAA03860@smc.vnet.net>
• Reply-to: murray at math.umass.edu

Would you still object to paclet delivery of bug fixes if the user had a 
choice of whether to accept the paclets?  Or at least if the delivery 
were "noisy" rather than quiet?

And isn't getting bug fixes quickly often more desirable than waiting 
for a new, numbered release?

David Bailey wrote:
> 
> I would also like to know just how far the packlet concept is intended 
> to go. For example, if actual code improvements (bug fixes) were to be 
> delivered in this way, I think it would be a very unfortunate step.

-- 
Murray Eisenberg                     murray at math.umass.edu
Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
Lederle Graduate Research Tower      phone 413 549-1020 (H)
University of Massachusetts                413 545-2859 (W)
710 North Pleasant Street            fax   413 545-1801
Amherst, MA 01003-9305

• References:
  • Re: Why use Java in Mathematica?
    • From: David Bailey <dave@Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>