Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2007
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Why use Java in Mathematica?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg78312] Re: Why use Java in Mathematica?
  • From: David Bailey <dave at Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 04:22:35 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <a6e65e8d0706220205m63dc9817id956db71bd8457c3@mail.gmail.com> <f5o7iq$4tk$1@smc.vnet.net> <200706260809.EAA03860@smc.vnet.net> <f5tbk1$21v$1@smc.vnet.net>

Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> Would you still object to paclet delivery of bug fixes if the user had a 
> choice of whether to accept the paclets?  Or at least if the delivery 
> were "noisy" rather than quiet?
> 
> And isn't getting bug fixes quickly often more desirable than waiting 
> for a new, numbered release?
> 
> David Bailey wrote:
>> I would also like to know just how far the packlet concept is intended 
>> to go. For example, if actual code improvements (bug fixes) were to be 
>> delivered in this way, I think it would be a very unfortunate step.
> 
I agree - if bug fixes arrived and were announced and you had the chance 
to accept/reject them, that would be much more acceptable - although 
even then it would create confusion when someone reports a problem with 
Mathematica - were they using 6.01246b?

Come to think of it, upgrades to the documentation could usefully follow 
the same convention - because then you would know there was something 
new to read!

David Bailey
http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk


  • Prev by Date: Re: System of differential-algebraic equations
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: problem with Pick
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Why use Java in Mathematica?
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Why use Java in Mathematica?