|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Integrate
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg74496] Re: Integrate
- From: "dimitris" <dimmechan at yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:06:03 -0500 (EST)
- References: <etikok$j7r$1@smc.vnet.net><etnkbj$gmr$1@smc.vnet.net>
Here is another interesting article:
http://209.85.135.104/search?q=cache:cXYcB2yox5QJ:www-calfor.lip6.fr/~rr/=
Calculemus03/davenport.pdf+the+difficulties+of+definite&hl=el&ct=clnk&c=
d=1&gl=gr
Regards
Dimitris
=CF/=C7 Michael Weyrauch =DD=E3=F1=E1=F8=E5:
> Hello ,
>
> sorry for not writing earlier in response to your comments...
>
> 1) These are really interesting examples of odd behaviour of our beloved
> CAS (related to Integration) you have been digging up. You even found=
undocumented features...!
>
> 2) Unfortunately, we cannot know in more detail why all this happens, bec=
ause
> we do not know how it really operates internally. And the devellopers=
who know, obviously do not
> want to answer???
>
> 3) For now I am glad that I have your workaround for my problem.
>
> I would like to mention that I also sent in a service call to Wolfram=
research
> thanks to a Premier Service contract my company pays for. But never g=
ot an answer.
>
> I perfectly understand that such a huge and difficult program as Math=
ematica has problems
> in some odd corners. And sometimes I really got great support and hel=
p in surmounting my problems
> by the support engineers or the devellopers, but here .... zero ...=
I wonder, if anybody else had similar experience
> recently ??
>
> Regards Michael Weyrauch
Prev by Date:
Re: a suprising result from Integrate (Null appeared in the
Next by Date:
Re: Re: Definite Integration in Mathematica
Previous by thread:
Re: Integrate
Next by thread:
Re: Integrate
|