|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Integrate
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg74499] Re: Integrate
- From: "dimitris" <dimmechan at yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:07:40 -0500 (EST)
- References: <etikok$j7r$1@smc.vnet.net><etnkbj$gmr$1@smc.vnet.net>
Hello Micheal!
I think you will find more than interesting the following articles:
http://209.85.135.104/search?q=cache:cXYcB2yox5QJ:www-calfor.lip6.fr/~rr/=
Calculemus03/davenport.pdf+the+difficulties&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3
(this is very old and a little obsolete but it deserves reading)
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/jeffrey93integration.html
Regards
Dimitris
=CF/=C7 Michael Weyrauch =DD=E3=F1=E1=F8=E5:
> Hello ,
>
> sorry for not writing earlier in response to your comments...
>
> 1) These are really interesting examples of odd behaviour of our beloved
> CAS (related to Integration) you have been digging up. You even found=
undocumented features...!
>
> 2) Unfortunately, we cannot know in more detail why all this happens, bec=
ause
> we do not know how it really operates internally. And the devellopers=
who know, obviously do not
> want to answer???
>
> 3) For now I am glad that I have your workaround for my problem.
>
> I would like to mention that I also sent in a service call to Wolfram=
research
> thanks to a Premier Service contract my company pays for. But never g=
ot an answer.
>
> I perfectly understand that such a huge and difficult program as Math=
ematica has problems
> in some odd corners. And sometimes I really got great support and hel=
p in surmounting my problems
> by the support engineers or the devellopers, but here .... zero ...=
I wonder, if anybody else had similar experience
> recently ??
>
> Regards Michael Weyrauch
Prev by Date:
Re: Re: Definite Integration in Mathematica
Next by Date:
Re: label graph vertices
Previous by thread:
Re: Integrate
Next by thread:
Precision available with NIntegrate {Method -> Oscillatory}
|