       Re: Struve functions

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg75715] Re: Struve functions
• From: dimitris <dimmechan at yahoo.com>
• Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 04:28:09 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <f1phmv\$il0\$1@smc.vnet.net>

```Thanks a lot!

Dimitris

=CF/=C7 Bhuvanesh =DD=E3=F1=E1=F8=E5:
> 5.2 did use convolution to get the result (by shifting the limits and com=
puting Integrate[StruveH[n, t*x], {x,0,1}]). In 6.0, we get:
>
> In:= Integrate[{StruveH[n, x], StruveL[n, x]}, x] //InputForm
>
> Out//InputForm=
> {2^(-2 - n)*x^(2 + n)*Gamma[1 + n/2]*HypergeometricPFQRegularized[{1, 1 +=
n/2}, {3/2 + n, 3/2, 2 + n/2},
>    -x^2/4], 2^(-2 - n)*x^(2 + n)*Gamma[1 + n/2]*HypergeometricPFQRegulari=
zed[{1, 1 + n/2},
>    {3/2 + n, 3/2, 2 + n/2}, x^2/4]}
>
> In:= D[%, x] - {StruveH[n, x], StruveL[n, x]} //FullSimplify
>
> Out= {0, 0}
>
> Bhuvanesh,
> Wolfram Research

```

• Prev by Date: Mathematica 6 Graphics Options
• Next by Date: Mathematica v6: Slower in the following fields
• Previous by thread: Re: Struve functions
• Next by thread: How come doesn't this work?