|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: HarmonicNumber bug and related Zeta disappointments
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg75745] Re: HarmonicNumber bug and related Zeta disappointments
- From: Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 04:44:37 -0400 (EDT)
On 5/6/07 at 1:54 AM, DWCantrell at sigmaxi.net (David W. Cantrell)
wrote:
>I'm fairly certainly that what I've found is a bug in
>HarmonicNumber. But I'd like the opinions of others. Furthermore,
>I'm still using version 5.2 and so would be interested to know if
>the same behavior is also found in version 6.
>In[2]:= HarmonicNumber[Infinity, r]
>Out[2]= Zeta[r]
=46WIW, version 6 running on Mac OS X returns
HarmonicNumber[Infinity, r] unevaluated
--
To reply via email subtract one hundred and four
Prev by Date:
Can one retain ver 5.1 if downloading ver 6.0?
Next by Date:
Re: MathPlayer???
Previous by thread:
HarmonicNumber bug and related Zeta disappointments
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [Mathematica 6] What happened to the
|