Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2007
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: HarmonicNumber bug and related Zeta disappointments

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg75745] Re: HarmonicNumber bug and related Zeta disappointments
  • From: Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at sbcglobal.net>
  • Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 04:44:37 -0400 (EDT)

On 5/6/07 at 1:54 AM, DWCantrell at sigmaxi.net (David W. Cantrell)
wrote:

>I'm fairly certainly that what I've found is a bug in
>HarmonicNumber. But I'd like the opinions of others. Furthermore,
>I'm still using version 5.2 and so would be interested to know if
>the same behavior is also found in version 6.

>In[2]:= HarmonicNumber[Infinity, r]
>Out[2]= Zeta[r]

=46WIW, version 6 running on Mac OS X returns
HarmonicNumber[Infinity, r] unevaluated
--
To reply via email subtract one hundred and four


  • Prev by Date: Can one retain ver 5.1 if downloading ver 6.0?
  • Next by Date: Re: MathPlayer???
  • Previous by thread: HarmonicNumber bug and related Zeta disappointments
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: [Mathematica 6] What happened to the