Re: mathematica 6.0 and geometrica
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg75735] Re: [mg75680] mathematica 6.0 and geometrica
- From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 04:39:08 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200705080959.FAA19076@smc.vnet.net>
You could just directly modify the $ContextPath to include "LinearAlgebra`" as needed. On 5/8/07, Marty Schettler <kchoose2 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, All -- > > I am having a lot of trouble updating to Mathematica 6.0, > particularly with geometrica05. Does anyone have any insights or > similiar problems? It has always been an annoyance that geometrica > does not define its symbols in a separate context (i.e. all of its > symbols are in Global`Geometrica05`Geometrica...for no apparent > reason). But now, it looks like since the function Projection is in > the kernel, it has made it virtually impossible to draw any geometrica > objects. Argh! Any advice/input would be greatly appreciated! > > Meanwhile, how is everyone liking Mathematica 6? Any advice on a less > painful update? It looks to me like it's going to take hours (or days) > to update all of my packages to support the new package structure, and > some functions seem to be just gone! (e.g. AppendRows). Anyone have > any great ideas on one-step updating? I've got functions all over the > place that call functions like > LinearAlgebra`MatrixManipulations`MatrixConditionNumber that are now > deprecated (speaking of which, I can use > LinearAlgebra`MatrixConditionNumber[m], with no problem, but if I try > to use <<LinearAlgebra` it complains about obsolete packages. Can > anyone explain that??? I am so confused, and frustrated that the > update is so difficult. > > > cheers! > Marty > > -- http://chris.chiasson.name/
- References:
- mathematica 6.0 and geometrica
- From: "Marty Schettler" <kchoose2@gmail.com>
- mathematica 6.0 and geometrica