|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg75839] Re: [mg75828] v. 6, third argument to rectangle
- From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 06:21:40 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200705110933.FAA06232@smc.vnet.net>
Try Inset
Also, you may want to change the AspectRatio->All for the graphs that
you are insetting.
BTW, the 6.0 syntax highlighter isn't always right.
On 5/11/07, rip pelletier <bitbucket at comcast.net> wrote:
> hi,
>
> thru 5.2 we could display, for example, 2 graphs side-by-side by using a
> third argument to Rectangle, the name of a graphics object.
>
> 6.0 tells me that i cannot call Rectangle with 3 arguments. (true, it
> was a bit of a kludge, and in principle i approve of it going away,
> but....)
>
> what is the replacement?
>
> thanks,
> rip
>
> --
> NB eddress is r i p 1 AT c o m c a s t DOT n e t
>
>
--
http://chris.chiasson.name/
Prev by Date:
Re: question 2
Next by Date:
Re: graphing curves in the complex plane
Previous by thread:
v. 6, third argument to rectangle
Next by thread:
Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
|