Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg75957] Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle*From*: rip pelletier <bitbucket at comcast.net>*Date*: Mon, 14 May 2007 03:33:45 -0400 (EDT)*References*: <200705110933.FAA06232@smc.vnet.net> <f21g6n$7hg$1@smc.vnet.net>

In article <f21g6n$7hg$1 at smc.vnet.net>, "Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name> wrote: > Try Inset > > Also, you may want to change the AspectRatio->All for the graphs that > you are insetting. > > BTW, the 6.0 syntax highlighter isn't always right. thanks for the suggestions. it seems the problem is more complicated than i thought. i need to do some work to find out why i get an error message saying Rectangle cannot be called with 3 arguments, although such calls work for other people. vale, rip > > On 5/11/07, rip pelletier <bitbucket at comcast.net> wrote: > > hi, > > > > thru 5.2 we could display, for example, 2 graphs side-by-side by using a > > third argument to Rectangle, the name of a graphics object. > > > > 6.0 tells me that i cannot call Rectangle with 3 arguments. (true, it > > was a bit of a kludge, and in principle i approve of it going away, > > but....) > > > > what is the replacement? > > > > thanks, > > rip > > > > -- > > NB eddress is r i p 1 AT c o m c a s t DOT n e t > > > > -- NB eddress is r i p 1 AT c o m c a s t DOT n e t

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle***From:*Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>

**References**:**v. 6, third argument to rectangle***From:*rip pelletier <bitbucket@comcast.net>