[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg75957] Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
• From: rip pelletier <bitbucket at comcast.net>
• Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 03:33:45 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <200705110933.FAA06232@smc.vnet.net> <f21g6n$7hg$1@smc.vnet.net>

In article <f21g6n$7hg$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
 "Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name> wrote:

> Try Inset
> 
> Also, you may want to change the AspectRatio->All for the graphs that
> you are insetting.
> 
> BTW, the 6.0 syntax highlighter isn't always right.

thanks for the suggestions. it seems the problem is more complicated 
than i thought. i need to do some work to find out why i get an error 
message saying Rectangle cannot be called with 3 arguments, although 
such calls work for other people.

vale,
   rip
> 
> On 5/11/07, rip pelletier <bitbucket at comcast.net> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > thru 5.2 we could display, for example, 2 graphs side-by-side by using a
> > third argument to Rectangle, the name of a graphics object.
> >
> > 6.0 tells me that i cannot call Rectangle with 3 arguments. (true, it
> > was a bit of a kludge, and in principle i approve of it going away,
> > but....)
> >
> > what is the replacement?
> >
> > thanks,
> >    rip
> >
> > --
> > NB eddress is r i p 1 AT c o m c a s t DOT n e t
> >
> >

-- 
NB eddress is r i p 1 AT c o m c a s t DOT n e t

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
    • From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>

• References:
  • v. 6, third argument to rectangle
    • From: rip pelletier <bitbucket@comcast.net>