MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: 2D Convolution

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg76163] Re: 2D Convolution
  • From: Mathieu G <ellocomateo at>
  • Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 05:55:06 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <f29389$m7p$><f29bko$pjn$> <f2emd1$2r6$>

CKWong a =E9crit :
> Errata:
> g should be the kernel in the function
> Convolve[f_, g_, x_?NumberQ, y_?NumberQ] := NIntegrate[f[
>     xPrime, yPrime] *g[x - xPrime,
>   y - yPrime], {xPrime, -=A1=DB, =A1=DB}, {yPrime, -=A1=DB,=
> Sorry for the snafu.
Thank you for your replies!!

I have a few questions still since I am neither a mathematician  or a
mathematica expert:

Is it necessary to use the <?NumberQ> part since using the Convolve
function for anything else would be non-sense? Does that bring any
improvement in the Mathematica computation?

Why does it make a difference that the kernel is the f or g function?

Best regards,

  • Prev by Date: Re: Integrate[s^s(1-s)^(1-s)Sin[Pi s],{s,0,1}]
  • Next by Date: Mathematica 6.0 and MatrixManipulations
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: 2D Convolution
  • Next by thread: Re: 2D Convolution