Re: Guessing "exact" values
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg76228] Re: Guessing "exact" values
- From: "Dana DeLouis" <dana.del at gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 06:09:15 -0400 (EDT)
Hi. This is not the best solution, but here's one idea I use. It's not the best solution, because I can't find a way to make Mathematica's Hyperlinks dynamic. In other words, once a hyperlink is made (Entered), it appears the address is locked in stone. Maybe an expert can jump in and make this dynamic. A number we know nothing about...(??) n = 6.283185307179586 Set the variable to something you would like to use. For me... NumberToSearch = n; Re-Enter this equation (Shift Enter), and then click the link. Hyperlink["Click Here: Plouffe's Inverter", StringReplace["http://bootes.math.uqam.ca/cgi-bin/ipcgi/lookup.\ pl?Submit=GO+&number=#&lookup_type=simple", "#" :> ToString[Evaluate[NumberToSearch], InputForm, NumberMarks -> False]]] The above click shows it might be 2 Pi. For your example, I took the full value: n=10.92477796076938 This number didn't work. Sometimes it won't work if the number is large. I don't know what "large" means, but the program really works with fractions. I decided to divided the number by 3. NumberToSearch = 10.92477796076938/3 3.641592653589793 If I re-enter the Hyperlink, and click the link, the solution is Pi+1/2. Multiply by 3 to get your equation. Reference: http://pi.lacim.uqam.ca/eng/ -- HTH :>) Dana DeLouis Windows XP & Mathematica 6.0 & Help files 5.2 :>~ "Szabolcs" <szhorvat at gmail.com> wrote in message news:f2eim0$t2f$1 at smc.vnet.net... > "Another computer algebra system" has a function, identify(), which > attempts to guess the exact expression that evaluates to a particular > numerical value. > > Example: > > In[1]:= N[3Pi+3/2,10] > > Out[1]= 10.92477796 > > > identify(10.92477796); > 3 > - + 3 Pi > 2 > > Is there a package with similar functionality for Mathematica? > > Szabolcs >
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Guessing "exact" values
- From: Murray Eisenberg <murray@math.umass.edu>
- Re: Re: Guessing "exact" values