Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2007
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: On typesetting

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg76665] Re: [mg76605] On typesetting
  • From: Selwyn Hollis <sh2.7183 at earthlink.net>
  • Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 06:41:52 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <f2u57d$k2n$1@smc.vnet.net> <200705230940.FAA24349@smc.vnet.net> <200705241019.GAA21739@smc.vnet.net> <ba40711f0705240555o5d8b062asf409eb712ecabe8b@mail.gmail.com>

It's only noticeable on-screen if you're in the Printout screen  
environment mode.

-- Selwyn


On May 24, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Lev Bishop wrote:

> On 5/24/07, Selwyn Hollis <sh2.7183 at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> I agree with most of your comments (especially about too much space
> after d in integrals) but...
>
>> (1) Embedding equations in text ruins line-spacing. There is excess
>> space below any line that contains an equation, even if the equation
>> is as simple as y=x.
>
> I see this in the pdf you posted, but I don't see it in my own
> mathematica documents. I wonder what the difference is. Does it show
> up on screen, or only in the printout?
>
> Lev



  • Prev by Date: matrices with arbitrary dimensionality
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: Weird result in Mathematica 6
  • Previous by thread: On typesetting
  • Next by thread: Re: On typesetting