Re: Choosing preferred functions for Trig Simplification?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg83203] Re: Choosing preferred functions for Trig Simplification?
- From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:31:15 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: Stanford University
- References: <email@example.com>
> In Simplifying expressions containing multiple Trig functions, I'd like
> to persuade Mathematica to limit its vocabulary to Sin, Cos and Tan,
> and avoid Sec, Csc and Cot (while continuing to put expressions into the
> simplest Together form, and so on).
Just to add a little fillip to this original query of mine, I'll make a
the following challenge/good faith offer:
If any regular posters to either of these groups can identify any
published optics or e-m theory text in which Snell's Law is written as
n1 Csc[ theta2 ] = n2 Csc[ theta1 ]
n1 Sin[ theta1 ] = n2 Sin[ theta2 ]
and Brewster's angle is written as
Cot[ thetaB ] = n1 / n2
Tan[thetaB] = n2/n1
(or any algebraically equivalent formulations using "cosecant" or
cotangent"), I'll write a $20 check to any (one!) U.S. tax-deductible
charitable organization selected by the first such responder . (Time of
email receipt in my MacBook Eudora IN box determines "first").
Prev by Date:
Re: Solving simple equations
Next by Date:
Re: memory release problem in mathematica6.0
Previous by thread:
Re: Mathematica, Graph Theory
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Choosing preferred functions for Trig Simplification?