|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Transparently passing on options to other functions
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg82331] Re: Transparently passing on options to other functions
- From: Will Robertson <wspr81 at gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:17:14 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <ff1ofp$861$1@smc.vnet.net>
On Oct 16, 4:16 pm, Art <grenan... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a good way to have OptionValue ignore this fact and not generate
> a warning? What is the proper way to transparently pass through options to
> other functions?
Hi Art,
I asked the exact same question (with no reply) a couple of weeks ago:
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica/msg/
fb38a24b6d71b1a6>
See that post for a possible solution to the problem. In short, you
have to filter the rules that are passed in before using OptionValue.
All the best,
Will
Prev by Date:
Re: Releasing several Holds simultaneously
Next by Date:
Re: Recursion limit: a good idea to ignore?
Previous by thread:
Re: Transparently passing on options to other functions
Next by thread:
Re: Transparently passing on options to other functions
|