MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Recursion limit: a good idea to ignore?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg82330] Re: Recursion limit: a good idea to ignore?
  • From: Will Robertson <wspr81 at gmail.com>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:16:43 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <feutsm$st$1@smc.vnet.net><ff1qqd$9gt$1@smc.vnet.net>

Hello all,

Many thanks for your comments. It seems unanimous that RecursionLimit
is designed to be lifted by the careful programmer. I don't know if
I'm careful enough :) but I'm happy for now.

All the best,
Will



  • Prev by Date: Re: Transparently passing on options to other functions
  • Next by Date: Re: Is this normal for Limit?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Recursion limit: a good idea to ignore?
  • Next by thread: Re: Recursion limit: a good idea to ignore?