       Re: rationalize numerator of quotient

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg81208] Re: rationalize numerator of quotient
• From: Peter Breitfeld <phbrf at t-online.de>
• Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:18:06 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <29319569.1189724898261.JavaMail.root@eastrmwml14.mgt.cox.net> <fcdf9p\$plc\$1@smc.vnet.net>

```Murray Eisenberg schrieb:
> Thanks to all who replied, either here or privately.  I didn't try the
> "obvious" method of using Simplify because, of course, I forgot
> Mathematica's conception of "simpler".
>
> And this is a good example where Mathematica's "simplify" is contrary to
> what is taught in school about when a fraction is simpler -- in high
> school it is often (unfortunately) taught that one should "rationalize"
> the fraction so that the square-root is in the numerator and never in
> the denominator.  Of course in calculus, when taking limits of such
> quotients, that is precisely what you do NOT want to do, but instead
> want to do what Mathematica's sense of simplifying here accomplishes.
>
[ little bit off-topic ]

I think this is relict of the times roots had to be calculated by
hand. To calculate 1/Sqrt you first had to calculate
Sqrt=1.4142 and then divide 1/1.4142. This is more work to be
done than simply dividing Sqrt by 2.

Gruss Peter
--
==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==
Peter Breitfeld, Bad Saulgau, Germany -- http://www.pBreitfeld.de

```

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: LegendreP error (bug?) in Mathematica
• Next by Date: Re: Re: numeric integration
• Previous by thread: Re: rationalize numerator of quotient
• Next by thread: Re: Re: rationalize numerator of quotient