[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rationalize numerator of quotient
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg81208] Re: rationalize numerator of quotient
*From*: Peter Breitfeld <phbrf at t-online.de>
*Date*: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:18:06 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <29319569.1189724898261.JavaMail.root@eastrmwml14.mgt.cox.net> <fcdf9p$plc$1@smc.vnet.net>
Murray Eisenberg schrieb:
> Thanks to all who replied, either here or privately. I didn't try the
> "obvious" method of using Simplify because, of course, I forgot
> Mathematica's conception of "simpler".
>
> And this is a good example where Mathematica's "simplify" is contrary to
> what is taught in school about when a fraction is simpler -- in high
> school it is often (unfortunately) taught that one should "rationalize"
> the fraction so that the square-root is in the numerator and never in
> the denominator. Of course in calculus, when taking limits of such
> quotients, that is precisely what you do NOT want to do, but instead
> want to do what Mathematica's sense of simplifying here accomplishes.
>
[ little bit off-topic ]
I think this is relict of the times roots had to be calculated by
hand. To calculate 1/Sqrt[2] you first had to calculate
Sqrt[2]=1.4142 and then divide 1/1.4142. This is more work to be
done than simply dividing Sqrt[2] by 2.
Gruss Peter
--
==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==
Peter Breitfeld, Bad Saulgau, Germany -- http://www.pBreitfeld.de
Prev by Date:
**Re: Re: LegendreP error (bug?) in Mathematica**
Next by Date:
**Re: Re: numeric integration**
Previous by thread:
**Re: rationalize numerator of quotient**
Next by thread:
**Re: Re: rationalize numerator of quotient**
| |