MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: rationalize numerator of quotient


Murray Eisenberg schrieb:
> Thanks to all who replied, either here or privately.  I didn't try the 
> "obvious" method of using Simplify because, of course, I forgot 
> Mathematica's conception of "simpler".
>
> And this is a good example where Mathematica's "simplify" is contrary to 
> what is taught in school about when a fraction is simpler -- in high 
> school it is often (unfortunately) taught that one should "rationalize" 
> the fraction so that the square-root is in the numerator and never in 
> the denominator.  Of course in calculus, when taking limits of such 
> quotients, that is precisely what you do NOT want to do, but instead 
> want to do what Mathematica's sense of simplifying here accomplishes.
>
[ little bit off-topic ]

I think this is relict of the times roots had to be calculated by
hand. To calculate 1/Sqrt[2] you first had to calculate
Sqrt[2]=1.4142 and then divide 1/1.4142. This is more work to be
done than simply dividing Sqrt[2] by 2.

Gruss Peter
-- 
==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==
Peter Breitfeld, Bad Saulgau, Germany -- http://www.pBreitfeld.de


  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: LegendreP error (bug?) in Mathematica
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: numeric integration
  • Previous by thread: Re: rationalize numerator of quotient
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: rationalize numerator of quotient