[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Problem when NIntegrate matrix
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg81360] Re: Problem when NIntegrate matrix
*From*: Szabolcs Horvát <szhorvat at gmail.com>
*Date*: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:54:28 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <fcqrrj$2jc$1@smc.vnet.net>
chiron1201 wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I can not understand why there is a NIntegrate::inum error when I try to evaluate the following code
>
> TEST = Piecewise[{
> {{{1, 2, 3}, {2, 3, 4}, {3, 4, 5}}, #1 < 0.00},
> {{{2, 3, 4}, {3, 4, 5}, {4, 5, 6}}, #1 >= 0.00},
> }] &;
>
> NIntegrate[TEST[x], {x, -1, +1}]
My guess is that NIntegrate[] evaluates its argument without x having a
numerical value (perhaps it tries to Compile[] it?), and makes
assumptions about the dimensions of the integrand based on this result.
Piecewise[...] is not a matrix (List of Lists), but a single expression.
But with a numerical argument is evaluates to a matrix. This might
confuse NIntegrate[].
In[1]:=
f[x_?NumericQ] := {1, 2}
g[x_] := {1, 2}
h[x_] := {x, 2 x}
In[4]:= NIntegrate[f[x], {x, 0, 3}]
During evaluation of In[4]:= NIntegrate::inum: Integrand f[x] is not \
numerical at {x} = {0.023872}. >>
During evaluation of In[4]:= NIntegrate::inum: Integrand f[x] is not \
numerical at {x} = {0.023872}. >>
Out[4]= NIntegrate[f[x], {x, 0, 3}]
In[5]:= NIntegrate[g[x], {x, 0, 3}]
Out[5]= {3., 6.}
In[6]:= NIntegrate[h[x], {x, 0, 3}]
Out[6]= {4.5, 9.}
Of course, this explanation does not solve your problem ... (and it
might even be flawed) ...
--
Szabolcs
Prev by Date:
**Re: Connecting 3D graphs together**
Next by Date:
**Re: How to slow down SWF?**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Problem when NIntegrate matrix**
Next by thread:
**Re: Problem when NIntegrate matrix**
| |