|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Re: Player Pro and Packages
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg87741] RE: [mg87641] Re: [mg87544] Player Pro and Packages
- From: "Ingolf Dahl" <ingolf.dahl at telia.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:06:23 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200804150947.FAA24752@smc.vnet.net>
> Player Pro won't load plain text package files. It will load
> package files which have been created using Encode[] or
> DumpSave[]. This restriction is to help ensure that behind
> the content created for a Player Pro is a genuine Mathematica license.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> John Fultz
> jfultz at wolfram.com
> User Interface Group
> Wolfram Research, Inc.
Maybe Wolfram should ask Adobe for an advice, how to ensure that behind the
content created for Adobe Reader is a genuine Adobe Acrobat license. The
problems involved seem to be quite equivalent. ;-)
It it really possible to lock up a tiger (Mathematica) behind chicken wire?
By the way, Publicon is in a way a complemetary product to Player Pro: just
editing, no evaluation. Is there any compatibility?
Ingolf Dahl
Sweden
Prev by Date:
Re: smart change of variables?
Next by Date:
Re: A Problem with Simplify
Previous by thread:
Re: Player Pro and Packages
Next by thread:
Re: Player Pro and Packages
|