|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Extending Integrate[]
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg87754] Extending Integrate[]
- From: Szabolcs Horvát <szhorvat at gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:51:42 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: University of Bergen
According to the documentation it is possible to extend Integrate[] with
new rules:
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/IntegralsThatCanAndCannotBeDone.html
The specific example that is given is:
Unprotect[Integrate]
Integrate[Sin[Sin[a_. + b_. x_]], x_] := Jones[a, x]/b
Now Integrate[Sin[Sin[3x]], x] will return Jones[0, x]/3
But if I try an integrand that is just slightly more complicated,
Mathematica returns it unevaluated:
In[21]:= Integrate[a + Sin[Sin[x]], x]
Out[21]= Integrate[a + Sin[Sin[x]], x]
My question is: Is it really possible to extend Integrate in an
intelligent way? The above example seems to be just simple pattern
matching. It would work with any function, not just Integrate[]. There
is nothing new or surprising about it.
But is it *really* possible to extend Integrate[] with new definitions
in a way that Mathematica will use these rules when calculating more
complicated Integrals?
If (as I suspect) it is not possible to do this, then the documentation
is a bit misleading ...
Prev by Date:
Re: List re-arrangement question
Next by Date:
If Integrate returns no result, can we conclude that no closed-form
Previous by thread:
Fw: Re: DifferenitalD vs CapitalDifferenitalD
Next by thread:
Re: Extending Integrate[]
|