|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Fw: Re: DifferenitalD vs CapitalDifferenitalD
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg88007] Fw: [mg87939] Re: DifferenitalD vs CapitalDifferenitalD
- From: "fizzy" <fizzycist at knology.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:39:17 -0400 (EDT)
The way this started was an Instructor friend is teaching a course in
Fields. He asked me why I use Mathematica rather then another product.
I explained and told him I would show him some examples. One
example I chose was to determine the Directional Derivative. Well,
this involves differentials. I merely wanted to 'highlight' the
differential visually. I wasnt trying to use DifferentialD as an
operator. Of course, I have seen DifferentialD often enough in
integrals. I was 'hoping' I could also use it this other way. for
example, the element of path length ,
ds = Sqrt[dx^2 + dy^2 ]
I would have preferred that I could type all the 'd's here as
DifferentialD and, of, course solve for DifferentialDs if I knew the
other differentials. But that was exactly what I couldnt do....In
principle there is nothing 'wrong' with simply ds, dx, etc...I just
wanted a different 'visual' on the screen.
thanks...Jerry Blimbaum
fizzy wrote:
> After applying Jens correction, I was hoping to be able to use the
> DifferentialD with x, etc. and then use the 'dx' , where 'd' here is
> DifferentialD (just dont know how to add it here in the email), so it
> would be a Symbol....but this didnt work....I realize I can use the
> straight forward dx , etc. symbol but I want to highlight the
> Differential....any way to 'fix' this?....when I type in
DifferentialD
> , from the Palette, and then add x to it and perform //Head on it , it
> just returns DifferentialD
>
> thank you....jerry blimbaum
>
\[DifferentialD]x cannot be used as a symbol because \[DifferentialD] is
treated as an operator. A symbol name must start with a letter.
But why do you want to use \[DifferentialD]x as a symbol anyway? I
cannot imagine any reasonable application for this. If you explained
your motivation for wanting to have a symbol with this name, perhaps we
could say something more useful ...
Prev by Date:
Fw: Re: DifferenitalD vs CapitalDifferenitalD
Next by Date:
Re: Re: Timing
Previous by thread:
Fw: Re: DifferenitalD vs CapitalDifferenitalD
Next by thread:
Extending Integrate[]
|