|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: DifferenitalD vs CapitalDifferenitalD
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg87939] Re: DifferenitalD vs CapitalDifferenitalD
- From: Szabolcs Horvát <szhorvat at gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 03:22:39 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: University of Bergen
- References: <fuees1$bds$1@smc.vnet.net>
fizzy wrote:
> After applying Jens correction, I was hoping to be able to use the
> DifferentialD with x, etc. and then use the 'dx' , where 'd' here is
> DifferentialD (just dont know how to add it here in the email), so it
> would be a Symbol....but this didnt work....I realize I can use the
> straight forward dx , etc. symbol but I want to highlight the
> Differential....any way to 'fix' this?....when I type in DifferentialD
> , from the Palette, and then add x to it and perform //Head on it , it
> just returns DifferentialD
>
> thank you....jerry blimbaum
>
\[DifferentialD]x cannot be used as a symbol because \[DifferentialD] is
treated as an operator. A symbol name must start with a letter.
But why do you want to use \[DifferentialD]x as a symbol anyway? I
cannot imagine any reasonable application for this. If you explained
your motivation for wanting to have a symbol with this name, perhaps we
could say something more useful ...
Prev by Date:
Re: Print[Plot] vs Print[text,Plot]?
Next by Date:
Re: Player Pro and Packages
Previous by thread:
Fw: Re: DifferenitalD vs CapitalDifferenitalD
Next by thread:
Re: DifferenitalD vs CapitalDifferenitalD
|