Re: Mathematica and F# [OT]
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg91603] Re: Mathematica and F# [OT]
- From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:40:43 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200808271042.GAA21194@smc.vnet.net> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
that's the reason why the new language has this funny "#"
symbol in it ! So you can wait for A#, B#, E#, ..
and in the sense of G. Orwells "new speak" we are waiting for
F##, F### and F#^4 ;-)
You see, the situation "only I, N, O, P, U remain!" is not so bad
because you can always add one or more "#" to the name of the new
language. Moreover there are more funny symbols on my keyboard
that are not used in the name of a programming language and
F#!&~@ should be the next step.
Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> I cannot resist noting that the name of the referenced language, "F#",
> continues a somewhat alarming trend of using single letters, possibly
> with suffixes, for languages names. Already there are:
> A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, Q, R, S, T, V, W, X, Y, Z
> (I cheated a bit: W never existed, but *W did.)
> To language developers, the situation is surely dismaying: only I, N, O,
> P, U remain!
> Salvatore Mangano wrote:
>> I refer members of this group to my blog for a review of the section of "F# for Scientists" that is relevant to Mathematica.
Prev by Date:
Re: How to get result in shape of fraction in Mathematica 4.2
Next by Date:
Re: Superimposing Normal on a Histogram of data
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Mathematica and F# [OT]
Next by thread:
can I have dynamic controls in Manipulate?