Re: Re: A problem in Pi digits as Lattice space filling
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg94049] Re: [mg93889] Re: A problem in Pi digits as Lattice space filling
- From: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 05:43:34 -0500 (EST)
- References: <ggj7co$j2i$1@smc.vnet.net> <200811261222.HAA22459@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: drmajorbob at longhorns.com
Such samples can be very convincing, but they do not constitute proof. In this case, the sample convinces me utterly that the digits are not normal; it merely INDICATES that their distribution might be uniform. Bobby On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:05:16 -0600, Roger Bagula <rlbagula at sbcglobal.net> wrote: > DrMajorBob wrote: > >>> first some picky things. The digits in Pi are not normal, but uniformly >>> distributed >>> >>> >> >> I doubt that (uniformity) is actually known. Is it? >> >> Bobby >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > Computed it to a number of digits: > >Pi digit occurances are flat. For 1.2 trillion decimal digits (Kanada), > >> > >> 0: 119,999,636,735 > >> 1: 120,000,035,569 > >> 2: 120,000,620,567 > >> 3: 119,999,716,885 > >> 4: 120,000,114,112 > >> 5: 119,999,710,206 > >> 6: 119,999,941,333 > >> 7: 119,999,740,505 > >> 8: 120,000,830,484 > >> 9: 119,999,653,604 > >> > > > http://www.builtonfacts.com/2008/07/26/off-the-normal-path/ > > -- DrMajorBob at longhorns.com