[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
A Use for Interpretation
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg85688] A Use for Interpretation
*From*: "David Park" <djmpark at comcast.net>
*Date*: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:00:08 -0500 (EST)
Since Version 6 appeared and I first encountered Interpretation I found it
rather difficult to understand what use it might have. The examples in Help
seem almost bizarre.
Here is one use where it works rather well. Teachers might often be
frustrated in demonstrating the behavior of basic function such as D,
Integrate or Limit because Mathematica automatically evaluates using its
built-in rules. With Interpretation we can define a pseudo routine that
displays as the real routine and then apply our own basic transformation
rules. Here is an example with a linear breakout of Integrate.
integrate[integrand_, var_] :=
Interpretation[HoldForm[Integrate[integrand, var]],
integrate[integrand, var]]
We then define rules that breakout sums and constant factors. The rules even
display in a nice form.
rule1 = integrate[a_ + b_, x_] -> integrate[a, x] + integrate[b, x]
rule2 = integrate[a_?(FreeQ[#, x] &) b_, x_] -> a integrate[b, x]
Then we can demonstrate how these rules work, performing the actual
integration in the last step.
integrate[5 a Sin[x] + y Cos[x] + x^2, x]
% //. rule1
% //. rule2
% /. Interpretation[a_, b_] :> ReleaseHold[a]
--
David Park
djmpark at comcast.net
http://home.comcast.net/~djmpark/
Prev by Date:
**C++ const and mathlink**
Next by Date:
**Re: [functional approach should give] an even faster way**
Previous by thread:
**Re: C++ const and mathlink**
Next by thread:
**Re: A Use for Interpretation**
| |