|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: ConditionNumber
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg89555] Re: [mg89532] Re: ConditionNumber
- From: "Szabolcs HorvÃt" <szhorvat at gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 06:30:20 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200806120657.CAA08823@smc.vnet.net>
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 09:57, Dana DeLouis <dana.del at gmail.com> wrote:
>> if you try: Norm->2 you get the message ...
>
>
>
> Hi. I have Ver 6, and not 6.0.2
>
>
>
> m = RandomInteger[{-9, 9}, {20, 20}] // N;
>
>
>
> If I do MatrixConditionNumber[m, Norm->2], it returns unevaluated.
> However,
>
>
>
> MatrixConditionNumber[m, 2]
>
> 65.3896
>
This is because you used MatrixConditionNumber from the old
LinearAlgebra`MatrixManipulation package, and not the built-in
LinearAlgebra`MatrixConditionNumber that Daniel mentioned.
Prev by Date:
Re: Don't understand replacement rule for some functions
Next by Date:
Re: Method->NMinimize in FindFit Crashes the Kernel
Previous by thread:
Re: ConditionNumber
Next by thread:
Determine brightness of colour/Convert to GrayLevel
|