MathGroup Archive 2008

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: NDSolve Question

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg86426] Re: NDSolve Question
  • From: Jerry <Jer75811 at yahoo.com>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:57:41 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <fqtqmp$d82$1@smc.vnet.net> <fr0ckv$ctm$1@smc.vnet.net> <fr2mds$o2e$1@smc.vnet.net>

Thank you sir; I embarrassed myself again.

jwmerrill at gmail.com wrote:
> On Mar 9, 6:03 am, Jerry <Jer75... at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Sir, I tried this and I only get plot axes, no graph.
>>
>> f[q_?NumberQ] := q
>> sol = NDSolve[{x'[t] == f[x[t]], x[0] == 0}, {x}, {t, 0, 1}]
>> Plot[x[t] /. sol, {t, 0, 1}]
> 
> Try using an initial condition such that your function isn't always
> 0 ;-).  In other words, 0*exp[t] == 0.
> 
> f[q_?NumberQ] := q
> sol = NDSolve[{x'[t] == f[x[t]], x[0] == 1}, {x}, {t, 0, 1}]
> Plot[x[t] /. sol, {t, 0, 1}]
> 
>> In place of {x} in sol I tried x and x[t] with no change.
>> In Plot I tried x instead of x[t], no help.
> 
> I think any of these will work, actually.
> 
> JM
> 
> 


  • Prev by Date: multivariate analysis library
  • Next by Date: Question on Sum[] function
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: NDSolve Question
  • Next by thread: Re: NDSolve Question