|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Does Mathematica really need more printed, introductory documentation?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg88296] Re: Does Mathematica really need more printed, introductory documentation?
- From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 03:19:18 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Stanford University
- References: <fv9aa3$mm0$1@smc.vnet.net>
In article <fv9aa3$mm0$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
Bill Rowe <readnews at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> I don't understand the problem here. The online documentation
> open up in a window in the front end just like any notebook. If
> you go to the menu bar and select Window->Magnification you will
> get a menu list allowing you to select several different
> magnification levels up to 300%. When you select one of these,
> all of the text is re-scaled by that factor. Isn't this adequate?
Yes --- except the enlargement doesn't "stick": Close the doc window,
come back to another one later, and the later one is not enlarged.
Also, secondarily, doesn't enlarge the window itself --- you get
enlarged text scrunched up in same size window.
Would be nice if defaults for both of these could be changed.
Prev by Date:
Re: Re: Wolfram User Interface Research?
Next by Date:
Re: Old Toolbar from 5.2 to 6.0.2
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Wolfram User Interface Research?
Next by thread:
Re: Does Mathematica really need more printed, introductory documentation?
|