[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Range of Use of Mathematica

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg89090] Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
• From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
• Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 03:24:02 -0400 (EDT)
• Organization: Stanford University
• References: <g0m8tt$14$1@smc.vnet.net> <g0rkfr$dtv$1@smc.vnet.net> <200805200627.CAA23235@smc.vnet.net> <g11qvh$a6r$1@smc.vnet.net> <200805220637.CAA22441@smc.vnet.net> <g15qp8$pe6$1@smc.vnet.net> <g18hqe$khq$1@smc.vnet.net>

In article <g18hqe$khq$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
 David Bailey <dave at Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk> wrote:

> > 
> > I'll point out that we also offer seminars on a variety of topics that  
> > are free, except for an hour or so of your time.  You can find more  
> > information at http://www.wolfram.com/services/education/seminars/.
> > 
> > Brett Champion
> > Wolfram Research
> > 
> Brett,
> 
> Do you offer video versions of these seminars so that we can watch them 
> at a convenient time?
> 
> David Bailey
> http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk

Brent and David,

Not to be snippy here --- or maybe the honest phrasing is, "to _be_ 
snippy about snipping" --- but have neither of you ever encountered the 
concept of snipping out the irrelevant portions of a message to which 
you are responding? 

In the present instance at least, readers had to page down through three 
to four _screenfuls_ of essentially irrelevant quotes in Brett's 
original posting in order to get to _three lines_ of actual information, 
and then do this once again in David's reply to get to his _two lines_ 
of further response?

Doesn't your newsreader make it easy to do that?

• References:
  • Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
    • From: David Bailey <dave@Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>
  • Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
    • From: David Bailey <dave@Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>