Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg89090] Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 03:24:02 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Stanford University
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <200805200627.CAA23235@smc.vnet.net> <email@example.com> <200805220637.CAA22441@smc.vnet.net> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
In article <g18hqe$khq$1 at smc.vnet.net>, David Bailey <dave at Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk> wrote: > > > > I'll point out that we also offer seminars on a variety of topics that > > are free, except for an hour or so of your time. You can find more > > information at http://www.wolfram.com/services/education/seminars/. > > > > Brett Champion > > Wolfram Research > > > Brett, > > Do you offer video versions of these seminars so that we can watch them > at a convenient time? > > David Bailey > http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk Brent and David, Not to be snippy here --- or maybe the honest phrasing is, "to _be_ snippy about snipping" --- but have neither of you ever encountered the concept of snipping out the irrelevant portions of a message to which you are responding? In the present instance at least, readers had to page down through three to four _screenfuls_ of essentially irrelevant quotes in Brett's original posting in order to get to _three lines_ of actual information, and then do this once again in David's reply to get to his _two lines_ of further response? Doesn't your newsreader make it easy to do that?