Re: Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg89113] Re: [mg89090] Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- From: DrMajorBob <drmajorbob at att.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 01:29:45 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <200805200627.CAA23235@smc.vnet.net> <email@example.com> <200805220637.CAA22441@smc.vnet.net> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <9818046.1211710983849.JavaMail.root@m08>
- Reply-to: drmajorbob at longhorns.com
What "newsreader"? And what news?
Me, I read e-mail.
On Sun, 25 May 2008 02:24:02 -0500, AES <siegman at stanford.edu> wrote:
> In article <g18hqe$khq$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
> David Bailey <dave at Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk> wrote:
>> > I'll point out that we also offer seminars on a variety of topics that
>> > are free, except for an hour or so of your time. You can find more
>> > information at http://www.wolfram.com/services/education/seminars/.
>> > Brett Champion
>> > Wolfram Research
>> Do you offer video versions of these seminars so that we can watch them
>> at a convenient time?
>> David Bailey
> Brent and David,
> Not to be snippy here --- or maybe the honest phrasing is, "to _be_
> snippy about snipping" --- but have neither of you ever encountered the
> concept of snipping out the irrelevant portions of a message to which
> you are responding?
> In the present instance at least, readers had to page down through three
> to four _screenfuls_ of essentially irrelevant quotes in Brett's
> original posting in order to get to _three lines_ of actual information,
> and then do this once again in David's reply to get to his _two lines_
> of further response?
> Doesn't your newsreader make it easy to do that?
DrMajorBob at longhorns.com
Prev by Date:
Re: Re: Re: LeastSquares using
Next by Date:
Re: Bug in Mathematica or my mistake?
Previous by thread:
Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Re: Range of Use of Mathematica