Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg89177] Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- From: David Bailey <dave at Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 04:45:32 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <g0m8tt$14$1@smc.vnet.net> <g0rkfr$dtv$1@smc.vnet.net> <200805200627.CAA23235@smc.vnet.net> <g11qvh$a6r$1@smc.vnet.net> <200805220637.CAA22441@smc.vnet.net> <g18hvh$km0$1@smc.vnet.net> <200805250718.DAA18797@smc.vnet.net> <g1e351$eqq$1@smc.vnet.net>
Murray Eisenberg wrote: > And this is one more place where well-conceived and well-executed > introductory BOOKS about Mathematica 6, or applying Mathematatica 6 to > specific subject areas, can help. > > So far, and so far as I am aware, we have only one instance of this: > (1) Lynch's "Dynamical Systems with Applications using Mathematica", and > (2) the additional Mathematica 6 notebooks to accompany Shaw's "Complex > Analysis with Mathematica". > > Now if some of the old pre-version 6 books were updated or, preferably > perhaps, new ones written, e.g., on: calculus; differential equations; > linear algebra; discrete math including combinatorics & graph theory. > Even a new Glynn & Gray, "Beginner's Guide..."! > > My impression is that in (much) earlier Mathematica versions, WRI went > out of its way to encourage and foster such 3rd party books (some of > which were, in fact, written by or co-authored by insiders). Either > this is not being done or, if it is, there's a considerable lag in such > efforts seeing the light of day. > > I remain convinced that some of the early success of Mathematica was the > existence of such books, beyond the intrinsic value of the software > itself. And I continue to hope that the seemingly print-averse, > pro-electronic enthusiasts within WRI do not totally dominate the > direction this takes. > I think a lot of us agree that there is a need for a physical book, but we realise that if the book followed the old comprehensive style it would become a huge multi-volume set! I suggest that a new book could follow the old Mathematica book style, but would make no attempt to be comprehensive. For example, where a section should logically refer to additional functions, these could be simply listed under "See also". A particularly specialised area - such as J/Link - could be summarised with the emphasis on the sort of problem it might address, and be followed by a few hyperlinks (which don't work from books, but you know what I mean). The aim would be to supply the in-depth overview of Mathematica, but use the fact that every reader would have the help system available as well. In particular, every logical omission would be covered by a "See also" link. David Bailey http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk
- References:
- Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- From: David Bailey <dave@Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>
- Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- From: David Bailey <dave@Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>
- Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- From: David Bailey <dave@Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>
- Re: Range of Use of Mathematica