Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg89160] Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 07:16:28 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Stanford University
- References: <g0m8tt$14$1@smc.vnet.net> <g0rkfr$dtv$1@smc.vnet.net> <200805200627.CAA23235@smc.vnet.net> <g11qvh$a6r$1@smc.vnet.net> <200805220637.CAA22441@smc.vnet.net> <g18hvh$km0$1@smc.vnet.net> <200805250718.DAA18797@smc.vnet.net> <g1e351$eqq$1@smc.vnet.net>
In article <g1e351$eqq$1 at smc.vnet.net>, Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu> wrote: > My impression is that in (much) earlier Mathematica versions, WRI went > out of its way to encourage and foster such 3rd party books (some of > which were, in fact, written by or co-authored by insiders). Either > this is not being done or, if it is, there's a considerable lag in such > efforts seeing the light of day. > > I remain convinced that some of the early success of Mathematica was the > existence of such books, beyond the intrinsic value of the software > itself. And I continue to hope that the seemingly print-averse, > pro-electronic enthusiasts within WRI do not totally dominate the > direction this takes. Murray and I are of course singing from exactly the same songbook in expressing views like these. I'll go further: WRIs failure to have done this with the ("revolutionary") transition to 6 is not just inexplicable but absolutely insane. Combined with Mathematica's pricing, I predict that it will do substantial damage to Mathematica's competitive status and market success.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>
- Re: Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- References:
- Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- From: David Bailey <dave@Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>
- Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- From: David Bailey <dave@Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>
- Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
- From: David Bailey <dave@Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>
- Re: Range of Use of Mathematica