[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Stacked Definitions

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg93556] Re: Stacked Definitions
• From: Albert Retey <awnl at gmx-topmail.de>
• Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:35:03 -0500 (EST)
• References: <gfimim$g0o$1@smc.vnet.net>

Nikolaus Rath schrieb:
> Hello,
> 
> If I make a definition of the form
> 
> temp[42][3] = 7
> 
> where is this rule stored? I would have expected it to be in
> DownValues[temp] or DownValues[temp[42]], but the first list is empty
> and the second gives a syntax error.

looks like a logic followup to your last post :-) The definition is here:

SubValues[temp]

I just realized that SubValues misses an own homepage in the
documentation, but the good old ?SubValues still works...

hth,

albert