|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Comparison between Mathematica and other symbolic systems
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg92570] Re: Comparison between Mathematica and other symbolic systems
- From: PaulDj <pauldj6 at gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:13:19 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <gbt2q3$lcv$1@smc.vnet.net> <gc4srt$eve$1@smc.vnet.net>
On Oct 3, 12:41 pm, Albert Retey <a... at gmx-topmail.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > As part of a presentation to students, I will have to support the
> > claim that "Mathematica is better than other systems when it comes to
> > symbolic computations".
>
> isn't this quite a stupid claim?
Albert,
yes it is, but that's an edited version, necessary for the post to
appear on this list. Still, I have to disagree with you, as only a
minority of the users switch from system to another depending on their
needs. Most of us probably master one or at most two systems. That's
it.
Paolo
Prev by Date:
Axis in two scales
Next by Date:
Re: Comparison between Mathematica and other
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Comparison between Mathematica and other symbolic
Next by thread:
Re: Comparison between Mathematica and other symbolic systems
|