|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Functional programming? (RPN -v- Algebraic)
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg92107] Re: Functional programming? (RPN -v- Algebraic)
- From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 04:59:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Stanford University
An hour or so ago I submitted a post with closing paragraph:
Which is why, in that situation, I fire up Mathematica in the laptop
rather than reaching for the calculator, and start writing functional
rather than procedural code. (I trust you all appreciate the double
entendre here: functional programming is the functional way to solve
problems and get answers).
which obviously should have read:
Which is why, in that situation, I fire up Mathematica in the laptop
rather than reaching for the calculator, and start writing PROCEDURAL
rather than FUNCTIONAL code. (I trust you all appreciate the double
entendre here: PROCEDURAL programming is the FUNCTIONAL way to solve
problems and get answers).
Apologies for the confusion (whether you agree with the conclusion or
not). I shouldn't try to hastily catch up on newsgroup reading the
morning after a 24-hour airline mal-adventure, while still only half
functional myself.
Prev by Date:
Re: the graphic of a function
Next by Date:
Re: Working modulo 2
Previous by thread:
Re: Functional programming? (RPN -v- Algebraic)
Next by thread:
Re: Functional programming? (RPN -v- Algebraic)
|