Re: Graphics and DisplayFunction

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg98203] Re: Graphics and DisplayFunction*From*: replicatorzed at gmail.com*Date*: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 04:48:31 -0500 (EST)*References*: <gqsn9m$3tr$1@smc.vnet.net>

Thanks for the answer Szabolcs, Ok, so if I understand it correctly then by using explicit DisplayFunctions, I display the *thing*, that is the side effect of the actual function. Obviously only things that are enclosed in Show can be thus displayed with DisplayFunctions, and - however it's just a guess - the various plot functions all utilize an internal Show which encloses their internal graphics. Thus - secondarily - DisplayFunction can be used with plotting functions as well. But then I simply don't understand why DisplayFunction is an option for Graphics? Neither Graphics[Circle[], DisplayFunction -> Identity] nor Graphics[Circle[], DisplayFunction -> Print]; work as I would expect. I understand, that ListPlot[{1, 2, 3}, DisplayFunction -> Identity] is displayed because of the sideeffect, that is NOT suppressed by a semicolon, while ListPlot[{1, 2, 3}, DisplayFunction -> Print]; displays the plot because of DisplayFunction Prints the sideeffect, that is otherwise suppressed by the semicolon. Still I don't understand why DisplayFunction does not work on Graphics as would be - for me - logical. Is this side-effect thing a frozen suboptimal situation of the pre6 era (which I'm quite familiar with, however I've never realized this difference, probably because I've managed to live without ever need to use Graphics directly), which WRI does not want to change? Istvan Szabolcs Horv=E1t wrote: > > As you said, both produce Graphics expressions. (More precisely, Graphics= *is* a Graphics expression.) But there's a difference: while Graphics[] i= s just a way to *represent* graphics, plotting functions also have a side e= ffect of *displaying* the graphics expressions that they produce. > > In Mathematica <= 5.2 it worked like this: Graphics expressions were fo= rmatted in the front end as --Graphics--, and they could be rendered with S= how[] (which called a function specified in DisplayFunction) > > In Mathematica >= 6, Graphics expressions are formatted as the actual p= icture they represent (in StandardForm/TranditionalForm). Apart from this,= everything works the same as in 5.2. Of course since the graphics are for= matted nicely in the front end, there's no need for displaying them in an e= xplicit way, so $DisplayFunction === Identity by default. > > But suppose now that you can't/don't use the front end for some reason, o= r use an alternative front end. Now it does make sense to use an explicit = command for showing the graphics. Try opening the command line version, an= d type <<Terminal` or <<JavaGraphics`. > > The reason for the semicolon not being highlighted after Graphics[]; is t= hat in 5.2 no one typed Graphics[...] expecting to get a plot, but using Pl= ot[...]; was quite common (to suppress displaying the return value, --Graph= ics--) >

**Re: simpler way to get a particular banded matrix?**

**Re: Update to Hinton Button/palette tutorial for Mathematica 7?**

**Re: Graphics and DisplayFunction**

**Re: Graphics and DisplayFunction**