MathGroup Archive: August 2009 [00505]

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Re: ParrallelDo and set::noval

To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Subject: [mg102687] Re: [mg102665] Re: ParrallelDo and set::noval
From: Patrick Scheibe <pscheibe at trm.uni-leipzig.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:01:04 -0400 (EDT)
References: <h63cgg$1b6$1@smc.vnet.net> <200908181007.GAA17567@smc.vnet.net>

Hi,

to get some help it is very very helpful to post
a *working* and *minimal* example. Try to evaluate the code of your last
post on a new kernel. What is TransDipPiPi supposed to mean?

Cheers
Patrick

On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 06:07 -0400, guerom00 wrote:
> Hmmm
> 
> Up ?
> 
> Any help would be much appreciated :)
>

References:
- Re: ParrallelDo and set::noval
  - From: guerom00 <guerom00@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Plot: Problem with Mesh Option

Next by Date: Re: Re: why the inputs are not ODEs in NDSolve function

Previous by thread: Re: ParrallelDo and set::noval

Next by thread: Re: ParrallelDo and set::noval