|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: ParrallelDo and set::noval
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg102687] Re: [mg102665] Re: ParrallelDo and set::noval
- From: Patrick Scheibe <pscheibe at trm.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:01:04 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <h63cgg$1b6$1@smc.vnet.net> <200908181007.GAA17567@smc.vnet.net>
Hi,
to get some help it is very very helpful to post
a *working* and *minimal* example. Try to evaluate the code of your last
post on a new kernel. What is TransDipPiPi supposed to mean?
Cheers
Patrick
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 06:07 -0400, guerom00 wrote:
> Hmmm
>
> Up ?
>
> Any help would be much appreciated :)
>
Prev by Date:
Plot: Problem with Mesh Option
Next by Date:
Re: Re: why the inputs are not ODEs in NDSolve function
Previous by thread:
Re: ParrallelDo and set::noval
Next by thread:
Re: ParrallelDo and set::noval
|