Re: Re: why the inputs are not ODEs in NDSolve function
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg102691] Re: [mg102670] Re: why the inputs are not ODEs in NDSolve function
- From: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:01:49 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <h6b4i1$rmk$1@smc.vnet.net> <200908181008.GAA17701@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: drmajorbob at bigfoot.com
There's no such thing as ThreadEqual.
Not at my machine.
Bobby
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 05:08:26 -0500, Alois Steindl
<asteindl at mch2ws4.mechanik.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> Hello,
> just input the following line (the first argument to NDSolve)
> Join[{de1, de2, de3}, init] //. ThreadEqual
> and have a close look at the result.
> Does it have the required form for NDSolve?
>
> Alois
>
>
>
--
DrMajorBob at bigfoot.com
- References:
- Re: why the inputs are not ODEs in NDSolve function
- From: Alois Steindl <asteindl@mch2ws4.mechanik.tuwien.ac.at>
- Re: why the inputs are not ODEs in NDSolve function