Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: why the inputs are not ODEs in NDSolve function

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg102691] Re: [mg102670] Re: why the inputs are not ODEs in NDSolve function
  • From: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:01:49 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <h6b4i1$rmk$1@smc.vnet.net> <200908181008.GAA17701@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: drmajorbob at bigfoot.com

There's no such thing as ThreadEqual.

Not at my machine.

Bobby

On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 05:08:26 -0500, Alois Steindl  
<asteindl at mch2ws4.mechanik.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:

> Hello,
> just input the following line (the first argument to NDSolve)
> 	Join[{de1, de2, de3}, init] //. ThreadEqual
> and have a close look at the result.
> Does it have the required form for NDSolve?
>
> Alois
>
>
>



-- 
DrMajorBob at bigfoot.com


  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: ParrallelDo and set::noval
  • Next by Date: Re: Newcomer Question
  • Previous by thread: Re: why the inputs are not ODEs in NDSolve function
  • Next by thread: Re: why the inputs are not ODEs in NDSolve function